I believe we have been fooled for far too long. We have misplaced our anger. MSM keeps us shielded and Huckabee is a perfect example of the control our government/NeoCons have over the MSM. You have to read the bottom of the newscast if you want to learn anything of Iraq. Or be internet savy which I am not. It was McCanes comment that led me down that path. You see, In the first Iraq, we staged our soldiers in Saudi Arabia holy land. Bin Laden has said this is the motivation behind 911. Muslim hatred of western occupation is well known. And now i believe the NeoCons are up to further shenanigans and I am very troubled. I believe the current NeoCon operations is to increase tension and violence in Iraq so we will be forced to stay in Iraq long after the NeoCons leave office. If the Sadr army decides to end the ceasefire on Saturday it is by NeoCon design.
I have struggled with McCanes comment for a week. It made no sence to me. Why did he say it? a)So Dems can beat him over the head with it for 100 days and energize their base. No b)So McCane the Neocon can pander to other Neocons and hurt himself greatly in the GE. I seriously doubt it. c)To help Al-Quida with recruiting and escalate tensions in Iraq. Well wheather this was his intension it will be its effect. After deciding on C I began to rethink the whole thing which led me to further conclusions. A democraric Iraq has never been on the NeoCon agenda. What if they already told us there true intensions. "were fighting them over there so we can break the American taxpayer over here." A classic bait and switch. Under this premise things become more clear. I was blind and now I see. 1)Why Bush said "My way or the highway". It pretty much garanteed no coalition. 2)How, with Iraq under all the surveilance America can bear, can you back up two 18 wheelers and steal Iraqs natural treasures from there museum and completly disappear? A neocon op design to destabalise/antangonize Iraq? Remember we are now trying to engage Muslems in an insurgency.
- Why didn't Rumsfeld send enough soldiers? His goal was never to set-up a viable Iraq so in actuallity he did send enough soldiers. They wanted looting and lawlessness.
4)Why would Rumsfeld released the military into the wild creating an insurgency? To fight them you first need a them. 5)I have further problems with Abu Grabe but the things I ask myself is who took these pictures but more importantly who released the pictures? It is standard Bush MO to attack the messenger but not this one time. I don't have time to make my case fully so I'll give the NeoCons a pass.
- Why Bush was so shocked and incredulous when we attacked Rummsfelds reputation and competence? Afterall, Rummsfeld has carried out the NeoCon agenda perfectly. He has done everything Bush has asked.
We have been fooled and have looked at the Iraq war thru a viable Iraq smokescreen. The Neocons continue to believe fully that it is better to fight them over there, and screw the poor over here. They see the writing on the wall, and want to create a situation where expelling ourselves out of Iraq will be difficult if not impossible. So expect an increase in violence( which I believe has already begun, but how do I know, storys about Iraq are illegal in our current MSM.) and watch us get stuck in deep Iraq mud. Nobody hopes I'm wrong more than I.