Tonite on O'Reilly, Michael Scheuer (one of the most credible and informative talking head on MSM) said something I found compelling. We never went over there to win. Which has been a theory of mine for the last month. And now that I believe I have a credible source. Though I agree it is not up to a high enough standard. However O'Reilly will be on again tonite and you can watch for yourself.
McSame has said we will be in Iraq for a hundred years.I have struggled with McCanes comment for a week. It made no sence to me. Why did he say it? a)So Dems can beat him over the head with it for 100 days and energize their base. No b)So McCane the Neocon can pander to other Neocons and hurt himself greatly in the GE. I seriously doubt it. c)To help Al-Quida with recruiting and escalate tensions in Iraq. Well wheather this was his intension it will be its effect. After deciding on C I began to rethink the whole thing which led me to further conclusions. A democraric Iraq has never been on the NeoCon agenda. What if they already told us there true intensions. "were fighting them over there so we can break the American taxpayer over here." A classic bait and switch. Under this premise things become more clear. I was blind and now I see. 1)Why Bush said "My way or the highway". It pretty much garuanteed no coalition. Nobody to look over your shoulder and judge. 2)How, with Iraq under all the surveilance America can bear, can you back up two 18 wheelers and steal Iraqs natural treasures from there museum and completly disappear? A neocon op design to destabalise/antangonize Iraq? Remember we are now trying to engage Muslems in an insurgency.
Why didn't Rumsfeld send enough soldiers? His goal was never to set-up a viable Iraq so in actuallity he did send enough soldiers. They wanted looting and lawlessness.
4)Why would Rumsfeld released the military into the wild creating an insurgency? To fight them you need a them.
5)I have further problems with Abu Grabe but the things I ask myself is who took these pictures but more importantly who released the pictures? It is standard Bush MO to attack the messenger but not this one time. I don't have time to make my case fully so I'll give the NeoCons a pass. The results are undeniable, bringing Al-Quida to Iraq.
- Why Bush was so shocked and incredulous when we attacked Rummsfelds reputation and competence? Afterall, Rummsfeld has carried out the NeoCon agenda perfectly. He has done everything Bush has asked.
We have been fooled and have looked at the Iraq war thru a viable Iraq smokescreen. The Neocons continue to believe fully that it is better to fight them over there. I would guess they are currently seeking to bog us down overseas to perpetuate their philosophy. I do not pocesss 16 intelligent agency's and have no idea what there up to but I feel like I'm in the third act of a classic Shakespearin' tragedy.